Fatcow Icon
W.J. Aldermen approve signs, street sweeping and radios for P.D.
by Cliff Clark
General Manager/Editor
cclark@heartlandpublications.com

Cleaning streets, closing streets, street signs, beginning preparations for the West Jefferson Centennial Celebration and providing additional communication equipment for its police officers topped the town’s Board of Aldermen agenda meeting last week.

“These streets can get awful bad (during the winter months),” said Alderman Calvin Green after the town’s maintenance director Eric Miller finished his monthly report.

The town has typically stopped street sweeping during the winter months because of the potential damage leftover salt from road treatments could have on the sweeper and cold weather.

However, with the unusually warm fall, Green suggested that if the weather permitted, the maintenance department could run the sweeper when needed.

Miller agreed that there would be occasions during the winter when the sweeper could be used.

It was generally agreed by the aldermen that when weather permitted, the town’s maintenance department would make an effort to operate the sweeper.

Crescent Lane partial closing

The aldermen also decided to partially close a portion of Crescent Lane, which is located adjacent to the CVS Pharmacy.

Commercial developers have purchased property off of Crescent Lane and are in process of putting together a site plan for the area’s development over the next several months.

A representative with Winston-Salem-based Quality Oil attended the meeting last week and said at least one “national” chain restaurant has indicated its interest in building there. The representative also said Quality has plans for building a specialized convenience store on the site.

The representative said that a final tract of land, needed before site plans can be developed, would be closing in weeks.

“Sounds like it would be good for the town,” said Alderman Stephen Shoemaker.

New signs for West Evergreen Street

Charles Joyce, a resident of Taylor Glen community also spoke to the aldermen during the public hearing portion of the meeting requesting a West Evergreen Street sign in the neighborhood.

Joyce told the aldermen he had moved to the Taylor Glen community in West Jefferson five years ago just before it was annexed by the town.

Joyce said that if he paid town taxes and used town water and sewer services, it seemed natural the West Evergreen street sign should be provided by the town.

He also said that without the signs, it could create issues if there was an emergency in the area.

“This has been ongoing for five years…I’m very worried that 9-1-1 might get confused. Why can’t we get a street sign?” asked Joyce.

Green said to Joyce that the town would erect signs for the roads.

However, Alderman Tom Hartman raised the question of other residents living on streets not maintained by the town asking for signage.

Town Attorney David Paletta answered. “No. It is a private street. It the property owner’s responsibility to pay for the sign.”

As the discussion ended, it was decided the town would erect two West Evergreen street signs.

Centennial Celebration corporation

The aldermen also passed a resolution to establish a non-profit corporation that would be used to help in the administration of the town’s centennial celebration in 2015.

Additional radios for police department

The issue of providing additional radios to the West Jefferson Police Department officers was brought up during police chief Jeff Rose’s monthly report to the aldermen.

“I’d like to see you go ahead and get what you need now,” said Alderman Lester Mullis about additional radios needed by the town’s police department.

The department has purchased eight new radios, but Rose said the department has yet to receive them, adding they should arrive within two weeks.

Mullis said that after one of the town’s officers was involved in a recent deadly shooting of a Laurel Spring man, it was important that officers could communicate to one another.

The aldermen asked Rose how the officer was “holding up.”

Rose thanked everyone for the support and that his officer was “doing as well as expected.”

As the meeting wrapped up, each of the aldermen, including Dr. Brett Summey and Mayor Dale Baldwin thanked all the town employees for their service and wished them a happy holiday season.

Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
GIGANTIC YARD SALE WEST JEFFERSON METHODIST CHURCH
MAY 4th 5:00 PM - 8:00 PM Hot Dog Supper Available MAY 5th -7:00 AM - 2:00PM Breakfast Availabl...
Apr 18, 2012 | 0 0 comments | 115 115 recommendations | email to a friend
full story
Ashe County Farmers Market opens for 2012
Spring, finally, in Ashe County brings nourishing rains, greening fields, a new generation of ani...
Mar 27, 2012 | 1 1 comments | 105 105 recommendations | email to a friend
full story
Senator Kay Hagan to visit Ashe County
U.S. Senator Kay R. Hagan will visit the Ashe Senior Center, at 180 Chattyrob Lane, West Jefferso...
Mar 26, 2012 | 0 0 comments | 114 114 recommendations | email to a friend
full story
Seeking lost dog
If anyone sees this dog please contact Ashe Humane Society 982-4297 or email me or ashehumane@sky...
Mar 26, 2012 | 0 0 comments | 98 98 recommendations | email to a friend
full story
Congrats to our son/baby! Graduate class of 2013! We have given you roots and now get to see your wings! We love you!!
Josh Gambill
Josh Gambill
slideshow
Fixing the bridge on Railroad Grade
Fixing the bridge on Railroad Grade
slideshow
NASCAR on two wheels
NASCAR on two wheels
slideshow
Bike Racing in West Jefferson
Bike Racing in West Jefferson
slideshow

Weather watchers needed
Weather watchers needed

News
Tax reform takes a good turn
by John Hood
John Locke Foundation
Jun 20, 2013 | 64 views | 0 0 comments | 12 12 recommendations | email to a friend | print

Life, the old saying goes, is best thought of as a journey, not a destination. When it comes to reforming North Carolina’s tax code, however, I’d say the reverse is true. The journey may have been messy over the past few months, as state lawmakers and policy analysts pitched and debated various plans. But in the end, all that will really matter is the destination.

Now that both the North Carolina House and Senate have fashioned tax-reform plans and are working out a consensus bill, I have some good news for you: the destination looks great.

The House tax bill is a good first step towards a simpler, fairer, pro-growth tax code. It cuts marginal tax rates on work, savings, and capital formation, and provides net tax relief to most North Carolina households. As a net tax cut, it has a fiscal impact equal to about 1 percent of the state’s General Fund revenue in the short run and about 2 percent in the long run.

The Senate’s new tax bill is an even bigger step towards a kind of tax code North Carolina needs. It establishes a 5.25 percent flat tax on personal income and eventually eliminates the corporate income tax, which is responsible for a disproportionate share of the complexity and economic damage imposed by the state’s entire tax code. If the Senate tax bill became law, North Carolina would go from having one of the nation’s worst tax climates for business to having one of the nation’s best.

Moreover, the new Senate bill was carefully designed to address concerns about the original Senate bill, which sought to expand the sales-tax base to more than 130 services and goods not currently taxed at the state level, including food. Those provisions served to impose new regulatory burdens on service industries and raised taxes on some North Carolinians of low to moderate incomes.

Forget all that – it’s gone. According to the legislature’s Fiscal Research Division, the new Senate tax bill will reduce taxes for virtually all North Carolina households — poor, wealthy, and in-between.

The flipside of doing that, however, is that the new Senate bill results in a larger net tax cut than either the House bill or the original Senate plan. It works out to about 2 percent of General Fund revenue in the short run and 5 percent in the long run.

It’s important to remember that the primary reason to reform the state tax code is to rejuvenate North Carolina’s economy. It needs it. Despite a modest uptick in job creation in recent months, our state continues to suffer from one of the country’s highest jobless rates and one of the country’s lowest growth rates in per-capita income.

Since the early 1990s, many of North Carolina’s national and international competitors have adopted pro-growth, market-oriented policies, including lower marginal tax rates on work, savings, and investment. Unfortunately, our leaders at the time chose to do nothing or even to go in the opposite direction. Since the mid-1990s, our economy has underperformed the regional and national averages. Even in boom years, we didn’t match the pacesetters. During the Great Recession, North Carolina swooned.

Tax reform is just one element of a broad comeback strategy for the state’s economy. We also need regulatory reform in the short run and better roads and schools in the long run. But tax reform is indispensable. Over the next few years, it’s worth devoting a significant share of the state’s annual revenue growth to making our tax climate more competitive. More capital formation and job creation will, in turn, generate more revenue to improve public services. North Carolina must trade in our current vicious cycle — weak economic performance producing chronic budget woes — for a virtuous cycle of growth and investment.

The House tax plan puts us on the road to the right destination. The new Senate tax plan puts us even further down that road. Let’s make the journey as short as possible.

Hood is president of the John Locke Foundation, which has just published First In Freedom: Transforming Ideas into Consequences for North Carolina. It is available at JohnLockeStore.com.

Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Jeff Joines
Jeff Joines
slideshow
J.B. Lawrence
J.B. Lawrence
slideshow
Bryan Edwards
Bryan Edwards
slideshow
Read More News
Sports
Tax reform takes a good turn
by John Hood
John Locke Foundation
Jun 20, 2013 | 64 views | 0 0 comments | 12 12 recommendations | email to a friend | print

Life, the old saying goes, is best thought of as a journey, not a destination. When it comes to reforming North Carolina’s tax code, however, I’d say the reverse is true. The journey may have been messy over the past few months, as state lawmakers and policy analysts pitched and debated various plans. But in the end, all that will really matter is the destination.

Now that both the North Carolina House and Senate have fashioned tax-reform plans and are working out a consensus bill, I have some good news for you: the destination looks great.

The House tax bill is a good first step towards a simpler, fairer, pro-growth tax code. It cuts marginal tax rates on work, savings, and capital formation, and provides net tax relief to most North Carolina households. As a net tax cut, it has a fiscal impact equal to about 1 percent of the state’s General Fund revenue in the short run and about 2 percent in the long run.

The Senate’s new tax bill is an even bigger step towards a kind of tax code North Carolina needs. It establishes a 5.25 percent flat tax on personal income and eventually eliminates the corporate income tax, which is responsible for a disproportionate share of the complexity and economic damage imposed by the state’s entire tax code. If the Senate tax bill became law, North Carolina would go from having one of the nation’s worst tax climates for business to having one of the nation’s best.

Moreover, the new Senate bill was carefully designed to address concerns about the original Senate bill, which sought to expand the sales-tax base to more than 130 services and goods not currently taxed at the state level, including food. Those provisions served to impose new regulatory burdens on service industries and raised taxes on some North Carolinians of low to moderate incomes.

Forget all that – it’s gone. According to the legislature’s Fiscal Research Division, the new Senate tax bill will reduce taxes for virtually all North Carolina households — poor, wealthy, and in-between.

The flipside of doing that, however, is that the new Senate bill results in a larger net tax cut than either the House bill or the original Senate plan. It works out to about 2 percent of General Fund revenue in the short run and 5 percent in the long run.

It’s important to remember that the primary reason to reform the state tax code is to rejuvenate North Carolina’s economy. It needs it. Despite a modest uptick in job creation in recent months, our state continues to suffer from one of the country’s highest jobless rates and one of the country’s lowest growth rates in per-capita income.

Since the early 1990s, many of North Carolina’s national and international competitors have adopted pro-growth, market-oriented policies, including lower marginal tax rates on work, savings, and investment. Unfortunately, our leaders at the time chose to do nothing or even to go in the opposite direction. Since the mid-1990s, our economy has underperformed the regional and national averages. Even in boom years, we didn’t match the pacesetters. During the Great Recession, North Carolina swooned.

Tax reform is just one element of a broad comeback strategy for the state’s economy. We also need regulatory reform in the short run and better roads and schools in the long run. But tax reform is indispensable. Over the next few years, it’s worth devoting a significant share of the state’s annual revenue growth to making our tax climate more competitive. More capital formation and job creation will, in turn, generate more revenue to improve public services. North Carolina must trade in our current vicious cycle — weak economic performance producing chronic budget woes — for a virtuous cycle of growth and investment.

The House tax plan puts us on the road to the right destination. The new Senate tax plan puts us even further down that road. Let’s make the journey as short as possible.

Hood is president of the John Locke Foundation, which has just published First In Freedom: Transforming Ideas into Consequences for North Carolina. It is available at JohnLockeStore.com.

Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Jeff Joines
Jeff Joines
slideshow
J.B. Lawrence
J.B. Lawrence
slideshow
Bryan Edwards
Bryan Edwards
slideshow
Read More Sports
Opinion
Tax reform takes a good turn
by John Hood
John Locke Foundation
Jun 20, 2013 | 64 views | 0 0 comments | 12 12 recommendations | email to a friend | print

Life, the old saying goes, is best thought of as a journey, not a destination. When it comes to reforming North Carolina’s tax code, however, I’d say the reverse is true. The journey may have been messy over the past few months, as state lawmakers and policy analysts pitched and debated various plans. But in the end, all that will really matter is the destination.

Now that both the North Carolina House and Senate have fashioned tax-reform plans and are working out a consensus bill, I have some good news for you: the destination looks great.

The House tax bill is a good first step towards a simpler, fairer, pro-growth tax code. It cuts marginal tax rates on work, savings, and capital formation, and provides net tax relief to most North Carolina households. As a net tax cut, it has a fiscal impact equal to about 1 percent of the state’s General Fund revenue in the short run and about 2 percent in the long run.

The Senate’s new tax bill is an even bigger step towards a kind of tax code North Carolina needs. It establishes a 5.25 percent flat tax on personal income and eventually eliminates the corporate income tax, which is responsible for a disproportionate share of the complexity and economic damage imposed by the state’s entire tax code. If the Senate tax bill became law, North Carolina would go from having one of the nation’s worst tax climates for business to having one of the nation’s best.

Moreover, the new Senate bill was carefully designed to address concerns about the original Senate bill, which sought to expand the sales-tax base to more than 130 services and goods not currently taxed at the state level, including food. Those provisions served to impose new regulatory burdens on service industries and raised taxes on some North Carolinians of low to moderate incomes.

Forget all that – it’s gone. According to the legislature’s Fiscal Research Division, the new Senate tax bill will reduce taxes for virtually all North Carolina households — poor, wealthy, and in-between.

The flipside of doing that, however, is that the new Senate bill results in a larger net tax cut than either the House bill or the original Senate plan. It works out to about 2 percent of General Fund revenue in the short run and 5 percent in the long run.

It’s important to remember that the primary reason to reform the state tax code is to rejuvenate North Carolina’s economy. It needs it. Despite a modest uptick in job creation in recent months, our state continues to suffer from one of the country’s highest jobless rates and one of the country’s lowest growth rates in per-capita income.

Since the early 1990s, many of North Carolina’s national and international competitors have adopted pro-growth, market-oriented policies, including lower marginal tax rates on work, savings, and investment. Unfortunately, our leaders at the time chose to do nothing or even to go in the opposite direction. Since the mid-1990s, our economy has underperformed the regional and national averages. Even in boom years, we didn’t match the pacesetters. During the Great Recession, North Carolina swooned.

Tax reform is just one element of a broad comeback strategy for the state’s economy. We also need regulatory reform in the short run and better roads and schools in the long run. But tax reform is indispensable. Over the next few years, it’s worth devoting a significant share of the state’s annual revenue growth to making our tax climate more competitive. More capital formation and job creation will, in turn, generate more revenue to improve public services. North Carolina must trade in our current vicious cycle — weak economic performance producing chronic budget woes — for a virtuous cycle of growth and investment.

The House tax plan puts us on the road to the right destination. The new Senate tax plan puts us even further down that road. Let’s make the journey as short as possible.

Hood is president of the John Locke Foundation, which has just published First In Freedom: Transforming Ideas into Consequences for North Carolina. It is available at JohnLockeStore.com.

Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Jeff Joines
Jeff Joines
slideshow
J.B. Lawrence
J.B. Lawrence
slideshow
Bryan Edwards
Bryan Edwards
slideshow
Read More Opinion
Weather
Sponsored By:

RSS Feeds
All articles feed
News feed
Sports feed
Videos feed
Obituaries feed
Opinion feed
Local Features
Tax reform takes a good turn
by John Hood
John Locke Foundation
Jun 20, 2013 | 64 views | 0 0 comments | 12 12 recommendations | email to a friend | print

Life, the old saying goes, is best thought of as a journey, not a destination. When it comes to reforming North Carolina’s tax code, however, I’d say the reverse is true. The journey may have been messy over the past few months, as state lawmakers and policy analysts pitched and debated various plans. But in the end, all that will really matter is the destination.

Now that both the North Carolina House and Senate have fashioned tax-reform plans and are working out a consensus bill, I have some good news for you: the destination looks great.

The House tax bill is a good first step towards a simpler, fairer, pro-growth tax code. It cuts marginal tax rates on work, savings, and capital formation, and provides net tax relief to most North Carolina households. As a net tax cut, it has a fiscal impact equal to about 1 percent of the state’s General Fund revenue in the short run and about 2 percent in the long run.

The Senate’s new tax bill is an even bigger step towards a kind of tax code North Carolina needs. It establishes a 5.25 percent flat tax on personal income and eventually eliminates the corporate income tax, which is responsible for a disproportionate share of the complexity and economic damage imposed by the state’s entire tax code. If the Senate tax bill became law, North Carolina would go from having one of the nation’s worst tax climates for business to having one of the nation’s best.

Moreover, the new Senate bill was carefully designed to address concerns about the original Senate bill, which sought to expand the sales-tax base to more than 130 services and goods not currently taxed at the state level, including food. Those provisions served to impose new regulatory burdens on service industries and raised taxes on some North Carolinians of low to moderate incomes.

Forget all that – it’s gone. According to the legislature’s Fiscal Research Division, the new Senate tax bill will reduce taxes for virtually all North Carolina households — poor, wealthy, and in-between.

The flipside of doing that, however, is that the new Senate bill results in a larger net tax cut than either the House bill or the original Senate plan. It works out to about 2 percent of General Fund revenue in the short run and 5 percent in the long run.

It’s important to remember that the primary reason to reform the state tax code is to rejuvenate North Carolina’s economy. It needs it. Despite a modest uptick in job creation in recent months, our state continues to suffer from one of the country’s highest jobless rates and one of the country’s lowest growth rates in per-capita income.

Since the early 1990s, many of North Carolina’s national and international competitors have adopted pro-growth, market-oriented policies, including lower marginal tax rates on work, savings, and investment. Unfortunately, our leaders at the time chose to do nothing or even to go in the opposite direction. Since the mid-1990s, our economy has underperformed the regional and national averages. Even in boom years, we didn’t match the pacesetters. During the Great Recession, North Carolina swooned.

Tax reform is just one element of a broad comeback strategy for the state’s economy. We also need regulatory reform in the short run and better roads and schools in the long run. But tax reform is indispensable. Over the next few years, it’s worth devoting a significant share of the state’s annual revenue growth to making our tax climate more competitive. More capital formation and job creation will, in turn, generate more revenue to improve public services. North Carolina must trade in our current vicious cycle — weak economic performance producing chronic budget woes — for a virtuous cycle of growth and investment.

The House tax plan puts us on the road to the right destination. The new Senate tax plan puts us even further down that road. Let’s make the journey as short as possible.

Hood is president of the John Locke Foundation, which has just published First In Freedom: Transforming Ideas into Consequences for North Carolina. It is available at JohnLockeStore.com.

Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Jeff Joines
Jeff Joines
slideshow
J.B. Lawrence
J.B. Lawrence
slideshow
Bryan Edwards
Bryan Edwards
slideshow
Read More Local Features
Poll
Sponsored By:

Tax reform takes a good turn
by John Hood
John Locke Foundation
Jun 20, 2013 | 64 views | 0 0 comments | 12 12 recommendations | email to a friend | print

Life, the old saying goes, is best thought of as a journey, not a destination. When it comes to reforming North Carolina’s tax code, however, I’d say the reverse is true. The journey may have been messy over the past few months, as state lawmakers and policy analysts pitched and debated various plans. But in the end, all that will really matter is the destination.

Now that both the North Carolina House and Senate have fashioned tax-reform plans and are working out a consensus bill, I have some good news for you: the destination looks great.

The House tax bill is a good first step towards a simpler, fairer, pro-growth tax code. It cuts marginal tax rates on work, savings, and capital formation, and provides net tax relief to most North Carolina households. As a net tax cut, it has a fiscal impact equal to about 1 percent of the state’s General Fund revenue in the short run and about 2 percent in the long run.

The Senate’s new tax bill is an even bigger step towards a kind of tax code North Carolina needs. It establishes a 5.25 percent flat tax on personal income and eventually eliminates the corporate income tax, which is responsible for a disproportionate share of the complexity and economic damage imposed by the state’s entire tax code. If the Senate tax bill became law, North Carolina would go from having one of the nation’s worst tax climates for business to having one of the nation’s best.

Moreover, the new Senate bill was carefully designed to address concerns about the original Senate bill, which sought to expand the sales-tax base to more than 130 services and goods not currently taxed at the state level, including food. Those provisions served to impose new regulatory burdens on service industries and raised taxes on some North Carolinians of low to moderate incomes.

Forget all that – it’s gone. According to the legislature’s Fiscal Research Division, the new Senate tax bill will reduce taxes for virtually all North Carolina households — poor, wealthy, and in-between.

The flipside of doing that, however, is that the new Senate bill results in a larger net tax cut than either the House bill or the original Senate plan. It works out to about 2 percent of General Fund revenue in the short run and 5 percent in the long run.

It’s important to remember that the primary reason to reform the state tax code is to rejuvenate North Carolina’s economy. It needs it. Despite a modest uptick in job creation in recent months, our state continues to suffer from one of the country’s highest jobless rates and one of the country’s lowest growth rates in per-capita income.

Since the early 1990s, many of North Carolina’s national and international competitors have adopted pro-growth, market-oriented policies, including lower marginal tax rates on work, savings, and investment. Unfortunately, our leaders at the time chose to do nothing or even to go in the opposite direction. Since the mid-1990s, our economy has underperformed the regional and national averages. Even in boom years, we didn’t match the pacesetters. During the Great Recession, North Carolina swooned.

Tax reform is just one element of a broad comeback strategy for the state’s economy. We also need regulatory reform in the short run and better roads and schools in the long run. But tax reform is indispensable. Over the next few years, it’s worth devoting a significant share of the state’s annual revenue growth to making our tax climate more competitive. More capital formation and job creation will, in turn, generate more revenue to improve public services. North Carolina must trade in our current vicious cycle — weak economic performance producing chronic budget woes — for a virtuous cycle of growth and investment.

The House tax plan puts us on the road to the right destination. The new Senate tax plan puts us even further down that road. Let’s make the journey as short as possible.

Hood is president of the John Locke Foundation, which has just published First In Freedom: Transforming Ideas into Consequences for North Carolina. It is available at JohnLockeStore.com.

Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Jeff Joines
Jeff Joines
slideshow
J.B. Lawrence
J.B. Lawrence
slideshow
Bryan Edwards
Bryan Edwards
slideshow
View Previous Polls
Special Sections
Tax reform takes a good turn
by John Hood
John Locke Foundation
Jun 20, 2013 | 64 views | 0 0 comments | 12 12 recommendations | email to a friend | print

Life, the old saying goes, is best thought of as a journey, not a destination. When it comes to reforming North Carolina’s tax code, however, I’d say the reverse is true. The journey may have been messy over the past few months, as state lawmakers and policy analysts pitched and debated various plans. But in the end, all that will really matter is the destination.

Now that both the North Carolina House and Senate have fashioned tax-reform plans and are working out a consensus bill, I have some good news for you: the destination looks great.

The House tax bill is a good first step towards a simpler, fairer, pro-growth tax code. It cuts marginal tax rates on work, savings, and capital formation, and provides net tax relief to most North Carolina households. As a net tax cut, it has a fiscal impact equal to about 1 percent of the state’s General Fund revenue in the short run and about 2 percent in the long run.

The Senate’s new tax bill is an even bigger step towards a kind of tax code North Carolina needs. It establishes a 5.25 percent flat tax on personal income and eventually eliminates the corporate income tax, which is responsible for a disproportionate share of the complexity and economic damage imposed by the state’s entire tax code. If the Senate tax bill became law, North Carolina would go from having one of the nation’s worst tax climates for business to having one of the nation’s best.

Moreover, the new Senate bill was carefully designed to address concerns about the original Senate bill, which sought to expand the sales-tax base to more than 130 services and goods not currently taxed at the state level, including food. Those provisions served to impose new regulatory burdens on service industries and raised taxes on some North Carolinians of low to moderate incomes.

Forget all that – it’s gone. According to the legislature’s Fiscal Research Division, the new Senate tax bill will reduce taxes for virtually all North Carolina households — poor, wealthy, and in-between.

The flipside of doing that, however, is that the new Senate bill results in a larger net tax cut than either the House bill or the original Senate plan. It works out to about 2 percent of General Fund revenue in the short run and 5 percent in the long run.

It’s important to remember that the primary reason to reform the state tax code is to rejuvenate North Carolina’s economy. It needs it. Despite a modest uptick in job creation in recent months, our state continues to suffer from one of the country’s highest jobless rates and one of the country’s lowest growth rates in per-capita income.

Since the early 1990s, many of North Carolina’s national and international competitors have adopted pro-growth, market-oriented policies, including lower marginal tax rates on work, savings, and investment. Unfortunately, our leaders at the time chose to do nothing or even to go in the opposite direction. Since the mid-1990s, our economy has underperformed the regional and national averages. Even in boom years, we didn’t match the pacesetters. During the Great Recession, North Carolina swooned.

Tax reform is just one element of a broad comeback strategy for the state’s economy. We also need regulatory reform in the short run and better roads and schools in the long run. But tax reform is indispensable. Over the next few years, it’s worth devoting a significant share of the state’s annual revenue growth to making our tax climate more competitive. More capital formation and job creation will, in turn, generate more revenue to improve public services. North Carolina must trade in our current vicious cycle — weak economic performance producing chronic budget woes — for a virtuous cycle of growth and investment.

The House tax plan puts us on the road to the right destination. The new Senate tax plan puts us even further down that road. Let’s make the journey as short as possible.

Hood is president of the John Locke Foundation, which has just published First In Freedom: Transforming Ideas into Consequences for North Carolina. It is available at JohnLockeStore.com.

Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Jeff Joines
Jeff Joines
slideshow
J.B. Lawrence
J.B. Lawrence
slideshow
Bryan Edwards
Bryan Edwards
slideshow
Tax reform takes a good turn
by John Hood
John Locke Foundation
Jun 20, 2013 | 64 views | 0 0 comments | 12 12 recommendations | email to a friend | print

Life, the old saying goes, is best thought of as a journey, not a destination. When it comes to reforming North Carolina’s tax code, however, I’d say the reverse is true. The journey may have been messy over the past few months, as state lawmakers and policy analysts pitched and debated various plans. But in the end, all that will really matter is the destination.

Now that both the North Carolina House and Senate have fashioned tax-reform plans and are working out a consensus bill, I have some good news for you: the destination looks great.

The House tax bill is a good first step towards a simpler, fairer, pro-growth tax code. It cuts marginal tax rates on work, savings, and capital formation, and provides net tax relief to most North Carolina households. As a net tax cut, it has a fiscal impact equal to about 1 percent of the state’s General Fund revenue in the short run and about 2 percent in the long run.

The Senate’s new tax bill is an even bigger step towards a kind of tax code North Carolina needs. It establishes a 5.25 percent flat tax on personal income and eventually eliminates the corporate income tax, which is responsible for a disproportionate share of the complexity and economic damage imposed by the state’s entire tax code. If the Senate tax bill became law, North Carolina would go from having one of the nation’s worst tax climates for business to having one of the nation’s best.

Moreover, the new Senate bill was carefully designed to address concerns about the original Senate bill, which sought to expand the sales-tax base to more than 130 services and goods not currently taxed at the state level, including food. Those provisions served to impose new regulatory burdens on service industries and raised taxes on some North Carolinians of low to moderate incomes.

Forget all that – it’s gone. According to the legislature’s Fiscal Research Division, the new Senate tax bill will reduce taxes for virtually all North Carolina households — poor, wealthy, and in-between.

The flipside of doing that, however, is that the new Senate bill results in a larger net tax cut than either the House bill or the original Senate plan. It works out to about 2 percent of General Fund revenue in the short run and 5 percent in the long run.

It’s important to remember that the primary reason to reform the state tax code is to rejuvenate North Carolina’s economy. It needs it. Despite a modest uptick in job creation in recent months, our state continues to suffer from one of the country’s highest jobless rates and one of the country’s lowest growth rates in per-capita income.

Since the early 1990s, many of North Carolina’s national and international competitors have adopted pro-growth, market-oriented policies, including lower marginal tax rates on work, savings, and investment. Unfortunately, our leaders at the time chose to do nothing or even to go in the opposite direction. Since the mid-1990s, our economy has underperformed the regional and national averages. Even in boom years, we didn’t match the pacesetters. During the Great Recession, North Carolina swooned.

Tax reform is just one element of a broad comeback strategy for the state’s economy. We also need regulatory reform in the short run and better roads and schools in the long run. But tax reform is indispensable. Over the next few years, it’s worth devoting a significant share of the state’s annual revenue growth to making our tax climate more competitive. More capital formation and job creation will, in turn, generate more revenue to improve public services. North Carolina must trade in our current vicious cycle — weak economic performance producing chronic budget woes — for a virtuous cycle of growth and investment.

The House tax plan puts us on the road to the right destination. The new Senate tax plan puts us even further down that road. Let’s make the journey as short as possible.

Hood is president of the John Locke Foundation, which has just published First In Freedom: Transforming Ideas into Consequences for North Carolina. It is available at JohnLockeStore.com.

Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Jeff Joines
Jeff Joines
slideshow
J.B. Lawrence
J.B. Lawrence
slideshow
Bryan Edwards
Bryan Edwards
slideshow