Fatcow Icon
Miscommunication creates confusion
by James Howell
Staff Writer
jhowell@heartlandpublications.com
Ashe County Manager Dr. Pat Mitchell explained the location of the property lines of the Old Fields property as Chairwoman of the board of commissioners Judy Porter Poe looked on.
Ashe County Manager Dr. Pat Mitchell explained the location of the property lines of the Old Fields property as Chairwoman of the board of commissioners Judy Porter Poe looked on.
slideshow

A proposed land swap for the “Old Fields” property was delayed during a working meeting of the Ashe County Board of Commissioners because of a miscommunication between all of the parties involved – the county, the Fleetwood Volunteer Fire Department, county emergency management representatives, and the private property owner.

That miscommunication has already had an impact on the Fleetwood VFD. In 2011, the department invested $15,000 to install underground water tanks on the Old Fields property, located near 457 Clarence Lyall Road, West Jefferson, and might now be forced to remove them.

During the working meeting of the county commissioners, the discussion focused on a piece of property used by Halsey’s Diesel Service & Parts as a driveway that crosses over property owned by Ashe County.

A land swap had been offered to Steve Halsey, the business owner, which would allow the county to receive property of equal size from Halsey in exchange for the property that Halsey’s driveway crosses.

“Through no fault of his own, Halsey has been using the county’s land for the past 28 years thinking it was his,” said Dr. Pat Mitchell, Ashe County’s manager.

If Halsey chooses to proceed with the land swap, the county might build a rescue squad facility adjacent to Halsey’s business, said Mitchell. The rescue building could also be used as a voting precinct.

Halsey said he is concerned that if a rescue squad building is placed near his business’ driveway, the large trucks he services would have a difficult time getting in and out.

During the last commission meeting, Commissioner Gerald Price said he had concerns that Halsey may have been coerced in some way to participate in the deal. “Are we sure that Halsey hasn’t been met with coercion of any kind to reach this agreement?” said Price at the meeting in October.

This was confirmed during Monday’s meeting when Halsey said he felt pressure to accept the deal from a rescue representative for the region. However, Halsey said, “coerced was too strong of a word.”

Halsey said he was under the impression that if he didn’t agree to the land swap, county officials would do what they wanted with the land they owned, which could potentially harm his business.

“I feel like I’ve been pushed into it (the land swap), one way or another,” said Halsey.

At that point, Board Chairman Judy Porter Poe quickly interjected by saying “Steve, if you’re against it (the land swap) in any way, the deal is off, and that’s fine with me.”

After the meeting, Mitchell said “I think what happened was (the rescue representative) might have suggested to Halsey that a straighter property line would accommodate a rescue building better,” she said.

According to Mitchell, Halsey may have left the discussion with the impression that the rescue representative was encouraging him to follow through with the property swap.

However, the problems with the Old Fields property extend far beyond Mr. Halsey and his business.

During the last commissioners’ meeting, members from the Fleetwood VFD voiced concerns that the land swap would void the fire department’s lease on the county’s land at the Old Fields property. On Monday, more details were revealed about the situation.

In July 2011, the Fleetwood VFD leased some of the land currently owned by the county for a 99 year period with plans to install water tanks that would be filled by a nearby stream. According to Mitchell, the county told the Fleetwood VFD they should wait before they installed the tanks because the area was in the process of being surveyed.

Three months after signing the lease, the Fleetwood VFD installed the underground water tanks on the property, unknown to the county, said Mitchell. Afterward, new surveys revealed the tanks had been installed on land belonging to the N.C. Department of Transportation; not Ashe County.

Steve Craven, chief of the Fleetwood VFD, said the county wasn’t completely forthcoming with much-needed information.

According to Craven, Patty Gambill, the county’s emergency management coordinator, told the Fleetwood VFD they shouldn’t install the water tanks due to “discrepancies with an adjoining property owner,” said Craven.

Craven said the Fleetwood VFD interpreted that statement to mean the fire department needed to get permission to install the tanks from Halsey, who, they believed, was the only adjoining property owner.

Once Halsey agreed, the Fleetwood VFD installed the underground tanks, at an investment of about $15,000, according to Craven.

However, the adjoining property owner Gambill referred to was actually the NC DOT, said Craven after the meeting.

Craven said the Fleetwood VFD wasn’t aware the DOT owned a portion of the Old Fields property because it didn’t appear on their original lease issued by the county. “We assumed the lease was correct,” said Craven.

“If we had the entire story from the beginning, we would have done things differently,” said Craven.

Because the DOT plans to widen U.S. 221, the tanks may need to be removed in order to complete the project.

The Fleetwood VFD asserted the county shouldn’t be involved; that the Fleetwood VFD should deal with the DOT themselves because they have a monetary investment in the land (the water tanks) and the county doesn’t.

When the property swap was first mentioned, their were discussions among county officials to place a rescue squad building on the county’s newly-acquired land, an asset the county may need with the widening of U.S. 221, said Mitchell.

Poe asked the Fleetwood VFD to forgo installation of any new equipment on the property until everyone has a better idea of where the property lines are.

Several options were offered to resolve the issues at the Old Fields property during the meeting.

One option offered by Commissioner Larry Rhodes was to let Halsey buy the land from the county, if Halsey is willing. This would require the fire department’s lease to be renegotiated. Also, Commissioner Gary Roark said the county could donate the land to the Fleetwood VFD.

The county may not be allowed, legally, to use either solution offered by Rhodes and Roark, said Mitchell. Those questions will be investigated by the county’s attorney before the board of commissioner’s next meeting in two weeks, she said.

“Counties are very limited in what they give away and what they can sell to other entities, so resolving this problem will take some more research moving forward,” said Mitchell.

It’s most likely, said Mitchell, the county will leave the lease intact and have a second survey of the of the Old Fields property.

Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
GIGANTIC YARD SALE WEST JEFFERSON METHODIST CHURCH
MAY 4th 5:00 PM - 8:00 PM Hot Dog Supper Available MAY 5th -7:00 AM - 2:00PM Breakfast Availabl...
Apr 18, 2012 | 0 0 comments | 116 116 recommendations | email to a friend
full story
Ashe County Farmers Market opens for 2012
Spring, finally, in Ashe County brings nourishing rains, greening fields, a new generation of ani...
Mar 27, 2012 | 1 1 comments | 107 107 recommendations | email to a friend
full story
Senator Kay Hagan to visit Ashe County
U.S. Senator Kay R. Hagan will visit the Ashe Senior Center, at 180 Chattyrob Lane, West Jefferso...
Mar 26, 2012 | 0 0 comments | 115 115 recommendations | email to a friend
full story
Seeking lost dog
If anyone sees this dog please contact Ashe Humane Society 982-4297 or email me or ashehumane@sky...
Mar 26, 2012 | 0 0 comments | 98 98 recommendations | email to a friend
full story
Congrats to our son/baby! Graduate class of 2013! We have given you roots and now get to see your wings! We love you!!
Josh Gambill
Josh Gambill
slideshow
Fixing the bridge on Railroad Grade
Fixing the bridge on Railroad Grade
slideshow
NASCAR on two wheels
NASCAR on two wheels
slideshow
Bike Racing in West Jefferson
Bike Racing in West Jefferson
slideshow

Weather watchers needed
Weather watchers needed

News
Tax reform takes a good turn
by John Hood
John Locke Foundation
Jun 20, 2013 | 109 views | 0 0 comments | 17 17 recommendations | email to a friend | print

Life, the old saying goes, is best thought of as a journey, not a destination. When it comes to reforming North Carolina’s tax code, however, I’d say the reverse is true. The journey may have been messy over the past few months, as state lawmakers and policy analysts pitched and debated various plans. But in the end, all that will really matter is the destination.

Now that both the North Carolina House and Senate have fashioned tax-reform plans and are working out a consensus bill, I have some good news for you: the destination looks great.

The House tax bill is a good first step towards a simpler, fairer, pro-growth tax code. It cuts marginal tax rates on work, savings, and capital formation, and provides net tax relief to most North Carolina households. As a net tax cut, it has a fiscal impact equal to about 1 percent of the state’s General Fund revenue in the short run and about 2 percent in the long run.

The Senate’s new tax bill is an even bigger step towards a kind of tax code North Carolina needs. It establishes a 5.25 percent flat tax on personal income and eventually eliminates the corporate income tax, which is responsible for a disproportionate share of the complexity and economic damage imposed by the state’s entire tax code. If the Senate tax bill became law, North Carolina would go from having one of the nation’s worst tax climates for business to having one of the nation’s best.

Moreover, the new Senate bill was carefully designed to address concerns about the original Senate bill, which sought to expand the sales-tax base to more than 130 services and goods not currently taxed at the state level, including food. Those provisions served to impose new regulatory burdens on service industries and raised taxes on some North Carolinians of low to moderate incomes.

Forget all that – it’s gone. According to the legislature’s Fiscal Research Division, the new Senate tax bill will reduce taxes for virtually all North Carolina households — poor, wealthy, and in-between.

The flipside of doing that, however, is that the new Senate bill results in a larger net tax cut than either the House bill or the original Senate plan. It works out to about 2 percent of General Fund revenue in the short run and 5 percent in the long run.

It’s important to remember that the primary reason to reform the state tax code is to rejuvenate North Carolina’s economy. It needs it. Despite a modest uptick in job creation in recent months, our state continues to suffer from one of the country’s highest jobless rates and one of the country’s lowest growth rates in per-capita income.

Since the early 1990s, many of North Carolina’s national and international competitors have adopted pro-growth, market-oriented policies, including lower marginal tax rates on work, savings, and investment. Unfortunately, our leaders at the time chose to do nothing or even to go in the opposite direction. Since the mid-1990s, our economy has underperformed the regional and national averages. Even in boom years, we didn’t match the pacesetters. During the Great Recession, North Carolina swooned.

Tax reform is just one element of a broad comeback strategy for the state’s economy. We also need regulatory reform in the short run and better roads and schools in the long run. But tax reform is indispensable. Over the next few years, it’s worth devoting a significant share of the state’s annual revenue growth to making our tax climate more competitive. More capital formation and job creation will, in turn, generate more revenue to improve public services. North Carolina must trade in our current vicious cycle — weak economic performance producing chronic budget woes — for a virtuous cycle of growth and investment.

The House tax plan puts us on the road to the right destination. The new Senate tax plan puts us even further down that road. Let’s make the journey as short as possible.

Hood is president of the John Locke Foundation, which has just published First In Freedom: Transforming Ideas into Consequences for North Carolina. It is available at JohnLockeStore.com.

Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Jeff Joines
Jeff Joines
slideshow
J.B. Lawrence
J.B. Lawrence
slideshow
Bryan Edwards
Bryan Edwards
slideshow
Read More News
Sports
Tax reform takes a good turn
by John Hood
John Locke Foundation
Jun 20, 2013 | 109 views | 0 0 comments | 17 17 recommendations | email to a friend | print

Life, the old saying goes, is best thought of as a journey, not a destination. When it comes to reforming North Carolina’s tax code, however, I’d say the reverse is true. The journey may have been messy over the past few months, as state lawmakers and policy analysts pitched and debated various plans. But in the end, all that will really matter is the destination.

Now that both the North Carolina House and Senate have fashioned tax-reform plans and are working out a consensus bill, I have some good news for you: the destination looks great.

The House tax bill is a good first step towards a simpler, fairer, pro-growth tax code. It cuts marginal tax rates on work, savings, and capital formation, and provides net tax relief to most North Carolina households. As a net tax cut, it has a fiscal impact equal to about 1 percent of the state’s General Fund revenue in the short run and about 2 percent in the long run.

The Senate’s new tax bill is an even bigger step towards a kind of tax code North Carolina needs. It establishes a 5.25 percent flat tax on personal income and eventually eliminates the corporate income tax, which is responsible for a disproportionate share of the complexity and economic damage imposed by the state’s entire tax code. If the Senate tax bill became law, North Carolina would go from having one of the nation’s worst tax climates for business to having one of the nation’s best.

Moreover, the new Senate bill was carefully designed to address concerns about the original Senate bill, which sought to expand the sales-tax base to more than 130 services and goods not currently taxed at the state level, including food. Those provisions served to impose new regulatory burdens on service industries and raised taxes on some North Carolinians of low to moderate incomes.

Forget all that – it’s gone. According to the legislature’s Fiscal Research Division, the new Senate tax bill will reduce taxes for virtually all North Carolina households — poor, wealthy, and in-between.

The flipside of doing that, however, is that the new Senate bill results in a larger net tax cut than either the House bill or the original Senate plan. It works out to about 2 percent of General Fund revenue in the short run and 5 percent in the long run.

It’s important to remember that the primary reason to reform the state tax code is to rejuvenate North Carolina’s economy. It needs it. Despite a modest uptick in job creation in recent months, our state continues to suffer from one of the country’s highest jobless rates and one of the country’s lowest growth rates in per-capita income.

Since the early 1990s, many of North Carolina’s national and international competitors have adopted pro-growth, market-oriented policies, including lower marginal tax rates on work, savings, and investment. Unfortunately, our leaders at the time chose to do nothing or even to go in the opposite direction. Since the mid-1990s, our economy has underperformed the regional and national averages. Even in boom years, we didn’t match the pacesetters. During the Great Recession, North Carolina swooned.

Tax reform is just one element of a broad comeback strategy for the state’s economy. We also need regulatory reform in the short run and better roads and schools in the long run. But tax reform is indispensable. Over the next few years, it’s worth devoting a significant share of the state’s annual revenue growth to making our tax climate more competitive. More capital formation and job creation will, in turn, generate more revenue to improve public services. North Carolina must trade in our current vicious cycle — weak economic performance producing chronic budget woes — for a virtuous cycle of growth and investment.

The House tax plan puts us on the road to the right destination. The new Senate tax plan puts us even further down that road. Let’s make the journey as short as possible.

Hood is president of the John Locke Foundation, which has just published First In Freedom: Transforming Ideas into Consequences for North Carolina. It is available at JohnLockeStore.com.

Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Jeff Joines
Jeff Joines
slideshow
J.B. Lawrence
J.B. Lawrence
slideshow
Bryan Edwards
Bryan Edwards
slideshow
Read More Sports
Opinion
Tax reform takes a good turn
by John Hood
John Locke Foundation
Jun 20, 2013 | 109 views | 0 0 comments | 17 17 recommendations | email to a friend | print

Life, the old saying goes, is best thought of as a journey, not a destination. When it comes to reforming North Carolina’s tax code, however, I’d say the reverse is true. The journey may have been messy over the past few months, as state lawmakers and policy analysts pitched and debated various plans. But in the end, all that will really matter is the destination.

Now that both the North Carolina House and Senate have fashioned tax-reform plans and are working out a consensus bill, I have some good news for you: the destination looks great.

The House tax bill is a good first step towards a simpler, fairer, pro-growth tax code. It cuts marginal tax rates on work, savings, and capital formation, and provides net tax relief to most North Carolina households. As a net tax cut, it has a fiscal impact equal to about 1 percent of the state’s General Fund revenue in the short run and about 2 percent in the long run.

The Senate’s new tax bill is an even bigger step towards a kind of tax code North Carolina needs. It establishes a 5.25 percent flat tax on personal income and eventually eliminates the corporate income tax, which is responsible for a disproportionate share of the complexity and economic damage imposed by the state’s entire tax code. If the Senate tax bill became law, North Carolina would go from having one of the nation’s worst tax climates for business to having one of the nation’s best.

Moreover, the new Senate bill was carefully designed to address concerns about the original Senate bill, which sought to expand the sales-tax base to more than 130 services and goods not currently taxed at the state level, including food. Those provisions served to impose new regulatory burdens on service industries and raised taxes on some North Carolinians of low to moderate incomes.

Forget all that – it’s gone. According to the legislature’s Fiscal Research Division, the new Senate tax bill will reduce taxes for virtually all North Carolina households — poor, wealthy, and in-between.

The flipside of doing that, however, is that the new Senate bill results in a larger net tax cut than either the House bill or the original Senate plan. It works out to about 2 percent of General Fund revenue in the short run and 5 percent in the long run.

It’s important to remember that the primary reason to reform the state tax code is to rejuvenate North Carolina’s economy. It needs it. Despite a modest uptick in job creation in recent months, our state continues to suffer from one of the country’s highest jobless rates and one of the country’s lowest growth rates in per-capita income.

Since the early 1990s, many of North Carolina’s national and international competitors have adopted pro-growth, market-oriented policies, including lower marginal tax rates on work, savings, and investment. Unfortunately, our leaders at the time chose to do nothing or even to go in the opposite direction. Since the mid-1990s, our economy has underperformed the regional and national averages. Even in boom years, we didn’t match the pacesetters. During the Great Recession, North Carolina swooned.

Tax reform is just one element of a broad comeback strategy for the state’s economy. We also need regulatory reform in the short run and better roads and schools in the long run. But tax reform is indispensable. Over the next few years, it’s worth devoting a significant share of the state’s annual revenue growth to making our tax climate more competitive. More capital formation and job creation will, in turn, generate more revenue to improve public services. North Carolina must trade in our current vicious cycle — weak economic performance producing chronic budget woes — for a virtuous cycle of growth and investment.

The House tax plan puts us on the road to the right destination. The new Senate tax plan puts us even further down that road. Let’s make the journey as short as possible.

Hood is president of the John Locke Foundation, which has just published First In Freedom: Transforming Ideas into Consequences for North Carolina. It is available at JohnLockeStore.com.

Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Jeff Joines
Jeff Joines
slideshow
J.B. Lawrence
J.B. Lawrence
slideshow
Bryan Edwards
Bryan Edwards
slideshow
Read More Opinion
Weather
Sponsored By:

RSS Feeds
All articles feed
News feed
Sports feed
Videos feed
Obituaries feed
Opinion feed
Local Features
Tax reform takes a good turn
by John Hood
John Locke Foundation
Jun 20, 2013 | 109 views | 0 0 comments | 17 17 recommendations | email to a friend | print

Life, the old saying goes, is best thought of as a journey, not a destination. When it comes to reforming North Carolina’s tax code, however, I’d say the reverse is true. The journey may have been messy over the past few months, as state lawmakers and policy analysts pitched and debated various plans. But in the end, all that will really matter is the destination.

Now that both the North Carolina House and Senate have fashioned tax-reform plans and are working out a consensus bill, I have some good news for you: the destination looks great.

The House tax bill is a good first step towards a simpler, fairer, pro-growth tax code. It cuts marginal tax rates on work, savings, and capital formation, and provides net tax relief to most North Carolina households. As a net tax cut, it has a fiscal impact equal to about 1 percent of the state’s General Fund revenue in the short run and about 2 percent in the long run.

The Senate’s new tax bill is an even bigger step towards a kind of tax code North Carolina needs. It establishes a 5.25 percent flat tax on personal income and eventually eliminates the corporate income tax, which is responsible for a disproportionate share of the complexity and economic damage imposed by the state’s entire tax code. If the Senate tax bill became law, North Carolina would go from having one of the nation’s worst tax climates for business to having one of the nation’s best.

Moreover, the new Senate bill was carefully designed to address concerns about the original Senate bill, which sought to expand the sales-tax base to more than 130 services and goods not currently taxed at the state level, including food. Those provisions served to impose new regulatory burdens on service industries and raised taxes on some North Carolinians of low to moderate incomes.

Forget all that – it’s gone. According to the legislature’s Fiscal Research Division, the new Senate tax bill will reduce taxes for virtually all North Carolina households — poor, wealthy, and in-between.

The flipside of doing that, however, is that the new Senate bill results in a larger net tax cut than either the House bill or the original Senate plan. It works out to about 2 percent of General Fund revenue in the short run and 5 percent in the long run.

It’s important to remember that the primary reason to reform the state tax code is to rejuvenate North Carolina’s economy. It needs it. Despite a modest uptick in job creation in recent months, our state continues to suffer from one of the country’s highest jobless rates and one of the country’s lowest growth rates in per-capita income.

Since the early 1990s, many of North Carolina’s national and international competitors have adopted pro-growth, market-oriented policies, including lower marginal tax rates on work, savings, and investment. Unfortunately, our leaders at the time chose to do nothing or even to go in the opposite direction. Since the mid-1990s, our economy has underperformed the regional and national averages. Even in boom years, we didn’t match the pacesetters. During the Great Recession, North Carolina swooned.

Tax reform is just one element of a broad comeback strategy for the state’s economy. We also need regulatory reform in the short run and better roads and schools in the long run. But tax reform is indispensable. Over the next few years, it’s worth devoting a significant share of the state’s annual revenue growth to making our tax climate more competitive. More capital formation and job creation will, in turn, generate more revenue to improve public services. North Carolina must trade in our current vicious cycle — weak economic performance producing chronic budget woes — for a virtuous cycle of growth and investment.

The House tax plan puts us on the road to the right destination. The new Senate tax plan puts us even further down that road. Let’s make the journey as short as possible.

Hood is president of the John Locke Foundation, which has just published First In Freedom: Transforming Ideas into Consequences for North Carolina. It is available at JohnLockeStore.com.

Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Jeff Joines
Jeff Joines
slideshow
J.B. Lawrence
J.B. Lawrence
slideshow
Bryan Edwards
Bryan Edwards
slideshow
Read More Local Features
Poll
Sponsored By:

Tax reform takes a good turn
by John Hood
John Locke Foundation
Jun 20, 2013 | 109 views | 0 0 comments | 17 17 recommendations | email to a friend | print

Life, the old saying goes, is best thought of as a journey, not a destination. When it comes to reforming North Carolina’s tax code, however, I’d say the reverse is true. The journey may have been messy over the past few months, as state lawmakers and policy analysts pitched and debated various plans. But in the end, all that will really matter is the destination.

Now that both the North Carolina House and Senate have fashioned tax-reform plans and are working out a consensus bill, I have some good news for you: the destination looks great.

The House tax bill is a good first step towards a simpler, fairer, pro-growth tax code. It cuts marginal tax rates on work, savings, and capital formation, and provides net tax relief to most North Carolina households. As a net tax cut, it has a fiscal impact equal to about 1 percent of the state’s General Fund revenue in the short run and about 2 percent in the long run.

The Senate’s new tax bill is an even bigger step towards a kind of tax code North Carolina needs. It establishes a 5.25 percent flat tax on personal income and eventually eliminates the corporate income tax, which is responsible for a disproportionate share of the complexity and economic damage imposed by the state’s entire tax code. If the Senate tax bill became law, North Carolina would go from having one of the nation’s worst tax climates for business to having one of the nation’s best.

Moreover, the new Senate bill was carefully designed to address concerns about the original Senate bill, which sought to expand the sales-tax base to more than 130 services and goods not currently taxed at the state level, including food. Those provisions served to impose new regulatory burdens on service industries and raised taxes on some North Carolinians of low to moderate incomes.

Forget all that – it’s gone. According to the legislature’s Fiscal Research Division, the new Senate tax bill will reduce taxes for virtually all North Carolina households — poor, wealthy, and in-between.

The flipside of doing that, however, is that the new Senate bill results in a larger net tax cut than either the House bill or the original Senate plan. It works out to about 2 percent of General Fund revenue in the short run and 5 percent in the long run.

It’s important to remember that the primary reason to reform the state tax code is to rejuvenate North Carolina’s economy. It needs it. Despite a modest uptick in job creation in recent months, our state continues to suffer from one of the country’s highest jobless rates and one of the country’s lowest growth rates in per-capita income.

Since the early 1990s, many of North Carolina’s national and international competitors have adopted pro-growth, market-oriented policies, including lower marginal tax rates on work, savings, and investment. Unfortunately, our leaders at the time chose to do nothing or even to go in the opposite direction. Since the mid-1990s, our economy has underperformed the regional and national averages. Even in boom years, we didn’t match the pacesetters. During the Great Recession, North Carolina swooned.

Tax reform is just one element of a broad comeback strategy for the state’s economy. We also need regulatory reform in the short run and better roads and schools in the long run. But tax reform is indispensable. Over the next few years, it’s worth devoting a significant share of the state’s annual revenue growth to making our tax climate more competitive. More capital formation and job creation will, in turn, generate more revenue to improve public services. North Carolina must trade in our current vicious cycle — weak economic performance producing chronic budget woes — for a virtuous cycle of growth and investment.

The House tax plan puts us on the road to the right destination. The new Senate tax plan puts us even further down that road. Let’s make the journey as short as possible.

Hood is president of the John Locke Foundation, which has just published First In Freedom: Transforming Ideas into Consequences for North Carolina. It is available at JohnLockeStore.com.

Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Jeff Joines
Jeff Joines
slideshow
J.B. Lawrence
J.B. Lawrence
slideshow
Bryan Edwards
Bryan Edwards
slideshow
View Previous Polls
Special Sections
Tax reform takes a good turn
by John Hood
John Locke Foundation
Jun 20, 2013 | 109 views | 0 0 comments | 17 17 recommendations | email to a friend | print

Life, the old saying goes, is best thought of as a journey, not a destination. When it comes to reforming North Carolina’s tax code, however, I’d say the reverse is true. The journey may have been messy over the past few months, as state lawmakers and policy analysts pitched and debated various plans. But in the end, all that will really matter is the destination.

Now that both the North Carolina House and Senate have fashioned tax-reform plans and are working out a consensus bill, I have some good news for you: the destination looks great.

The House tax bill is a good first step towards a simpler, fairer, pro-growth tax code. It cuts marginal tax rates on work, savings, and capital formation, and provides net tax relief to most North Carolina households. As a net tax cut, it has a fiscal impact equal to about 1 percent of the state’s General Fund revenue in the short run and about 2 percent in the long run.

The Senate’s new tax bill is an even bigger step towards a kind of tax code North Carolina needs. It establishes a 5.25 percent flat tax on personal income and eventually eliminates the corporate income tax, which is responsible for a disproportionate share of the complexity and economic damage imposed by the state’s entire tax code. If the Senate tax bill became law, North Carolina would go from having one of the nation’s worst tax climates for business to having one of the nation’s best.

Moreover, the new Senate bill was carefully designed to address concerns about the original Senate bill, which sought to expand the sales-tax base to more than 130 services and goods not currently taxed at the state level, including food. Those provisions served to impose new regulatory burdens on service industries and raised taxes on some North Carolinians of low to moderate incomes.

Forget all that – it’s gone. According to the legislature’s Fiscal Research Division, the new Senate tax bill will reduce taxes for virtually all North Carolina households — poor, wealthy, and in-between.

The flipside of doing that, however, is that the new Senate bill results in a larger net tax cut than either the House bill or the original Senate plan. It works out to about 2 percent of General Fund revenue in the short run and 5 percent in the long run.

It’s important to remember that the primary reason to reform the state tax code is to rejuvenate North Carolina’s economy. It needs it. Despite a modest uptick in job creation in recent months, our state continues to suffer from one of the country’s highest jobless rates and one of the country’s lowest growth rates in per-capita income.

Since the early 1990s, many of North Carolina’s national and international competitors have adopted pro-growth, market-oriented policies, including lower marginal tax rates on work, savings, and investment. Unfortunately, our leaders at the time chose to do nothing or even to go in the opposite direction. Since the mid-1990s, our economy has underperformed the regional and national averages. Even in boom years, we didn’t match the pacesetters. During the Great Recession, North Carolina swooned.

Tax reform is just one element of a broad comeback strategy for the state’s economy. We also need regulatory reform in the short run and better roads and schools in the long run. But tax reform is indispensable. Over the next few years, it’s worth devoting a significant share of the state’s annual revenue growth to making our tax climate more competitive. More capital formation and job creation will, in turn, generate more revenue to improve public services. North Carolina must trade in our current vicious cycle — weak economic performance producing chronic budget woes — for a virtuous cycle of growth and investment.

The House tax plan puts us on the road to the right destination. The new Senate tax plan puts us even further down that road. Let’s make the journey as short as possible.

Hood is president of the John Locke Foundation, which has just published First In Freedom: Transforming Ideas into Consequences for North Carolina. It is available at JohnLockeStore.com.

Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Jeff Joines
Jeff Joines
slideshow
J.B. Lawrence
J.B. Lawrence
slideshow
Bryan Edwards
Bryan Edwards
slideshow
Tax reform takes a good turn
by John Hood
John Locke Foundation
Jun 20, 2013 | 109 views | 0 0 comments | 17 17 recommendations | email to a friend | print

Life, the old saying goes, is best thought of as a journey, not a destination. When it comes to reforming North Carolina’s tax code, however, I’d say the reverse is true. The journey may have been messy over the past few months, as state lawmakers and policy analysts pitched and debated various plans. But in the end, all that will really matter is the destination.

Now that both the North Carolina House and Senate have fashioned tax-reform plans and are working out a consensus bill, I have some good news for you: the destination looks great.

The House tax bill is a good first step towards a simpler, fairer, pro-growth tax code. It cuts marginal tax rates on work, savings, and capital formation, and provides net tax relief to most North Carolina households. As a net tax cut, it has a fiscal impact equal to about 1 percent of the state’s General Fund revenue in the short run and about 2 percent in the long run.

The Senate’s new tax bill is an even bigger step towards a kind of tax code North Carolina needs. It establishes a 5.25 percent flat tax on personal income and eventually eliminates the corporate income tax, which is responsible for a disproportionate share of the complexity and economic damage imposed by the state’s entire tax code. If the Senate tax bill became law, North Carolina would go from having one of the nation’s worst tax climates for business to having one of the nation’s best.

Moreover, the new Senate bill was carefully designed to address concerns about the original Senate bill, which sought to expand the sales-tax base to more than 130 services and goods not currently taxed at the state level, including food. Those provisions served to impose new regulatory burdens on service industries and raised taxes on some North Carolinians of low to moderate incomes.

Forget all that – it’s gone. According to the legislature’s Fiscal Research Division, the new Senate tax bill will reduce taxes for virtually all North Carolina households — poor, wealthy, and in-between.

The flipside of doing that, however, is that the new Senate bill results in a larger net tax cut than either the House bill or the original Senate plan. It works out to about 2 percent of General Fund revenue in the short run and 5 percent in the long run.

It’s important to remember that the primary reason to reform the state tax code is to rejuvenate North Carolina’s economy. It needs it. Despite a modest uptick in job creation in recent months, our state continues to suffer from one of the country’s highest jobless rates and one of the country’s lowest growth rates in per-capita income.

Since the early 1990s, many of North Carolina’s national and international competitors have adopted pro-growth, market-oriented policies, including lower marginal tax rates on work, savings, and investment. Unfortunately, our leaders at the time chose to do nothing or even to go in the opposite direction. Since the mid-1990s, our economy has underperformed the regional and national averages. Even in boom years, we didn’t match the pacesetters. During the Great Recession, North Carolina swooned.

Tax reform is just one element of a broad comeback strategy for the state’s economy. We also need regulatory reform in the short run and better roads and schools in the long run. But tax reform is indispensable. Over the next few years, it’s worth devoting a significant share of the state’s annual revenue growth to making our tax climate more competitive. More capital formation and job creation will, in turn, generate more revenue to improve public services. North Carolina must trade in our current vicious cycle — weak economic performance producing chronic budget woes — for a virtuous cycle of growth and investment.

The House tax plan puts us on the road to the right destination. The new Senate tax plan puts us even further down that road. Let’s make the journey as short as possible.

Hood is president of the John Locke Foundation, which has just published First In Freedom: Transforming Ideas into Consequences for North Carolina. It is available at JohnLockeStore.com.

Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
Jeff Joines
Jeff Joines
slideshow
J.B. Lawrence
J.B. Lawrence
slideshow
Bryan Edwards
Bryan Edwards
slideshow