Hellooooo? It’s already state law.
18 months ago | 402 views | 2 2 comments | 5 5 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Regardless of your leanings on Gay marriage, the recent attempt to force an amendment to North Carolina’s constitution on the issue is at least a waste of time.

More than likely it is also political pandering to conservatives.

Considering the evidence, one could question whether some conservative groups aren’t just trying to whip the masses into a frenzy to increase their political power.

About 3,000 conservatives showed up on the streets of Raleigh Tuesday in support of a statewide vote to push for a constitutional amendment defining marriage as being between a man and a woman.

Hellooooo?

It’s already state law.

State law defines marriage as one created by “consent of a male and female person.” Seems pretty clear cut.

A constitutional amendment would be more difficult to change than this statute, but the current environment in North Carolina doesn’t seem to offer much easy change of that particular law.

Even if you oppose Gay marriage, why would you feel the need to demand a constitutional amendment in this place, in this time when thousands of jobless people are on the verge of going hungry and homeless?

Most likely it is irrational, homophobic fear that drives conservatives to beat their chests about the issue.

So they stir up their constituents, spend countless hours bending the ears and arms of legislators for an answer that really has no question. It’s already the law.

Democrats buried the proposal in four committee reviews, an unheard of number of steps for passing a measure. A constitutional amendment is a huge change, worthy of significant review, but in truth, Democratic leaders are using politics, also.

They are burying the measure in committee because doing so is the most expedient way of moving on to the state’s urgent business -- finding a way to help their constituents obtain food, shelter, heat and healthcare in an economic crisis ballooning to more than $3 billion in state deficit.

They could spend countless hours debating Gay marriage and fending off accusations that they are the devil’s spawn.

They could spend their time that way or they could spend it trying to find a way to make sure the state’s hungry and homeless are fed and housed. They could spend it trying to find ways to encourage jobs that would feed, and house and provide health care to state residents.

comments (2)
« fishinbuddy wrote on Tuesday, Mar 10 at 04:55 PM »
It seems very hypocritical to me to decry gay marriage as a threat to marriage when many hold this institution in very low regards in the first place. It seems like a more imminent threat to marriage would be divorce but no one wants to outlaw divorce. JenHamby obviously is quoting second hand bs in her assessments of homosexuals. It does not violate the laws of nature and has no more adverse side effects than being heterosexual. I think we should allow gay marriage, that or ban divorce if we are really going to be serious about protecting marriage. I think all unions should be civil unions. If you want to get married, go to church.
« JenHamby wrote on Monday, Mar 09 at 04:00 PM »
I was surprised at this when I first heard. I am glad that these conservatives went to stand for their beliefs. In today's society, it seems the only acceptable form of bigotry is Christian bashing. I'm glad that Christians decided to voice their opinion, especially since when a Christian says something they are generally accused of Hate Speech. Homosexuality is wrong. It goes against the laws of nature and the Bible. But it's also bad medically. If you don't believe that, then go find someone who works in a hospital and ask if they have had any experiences with homosexuals seeking treatment.

And, Mr. Editor, I appreciate that this is your opinion section, but I HATE the way you seem to use the word "conservative." It's like you are looking down on them. It's easy to see that you are very liberal, and probably disagree with the conservatives that recently made the trip to Raleigh. But don't worry, you can still go to Massachusetts(since you lost California!) if you are looking for a state to get married in.
Weather
Sponsored By:




Lottery
Sponsored By:

Stocks
Sponsored By:

featured businesses
Gasoline Prices
Sponsored By:

Recipes
Sponsored By: